Showing posts with label Perl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Perl. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Apache Performance Tuning BASH Script

BASH Script to tune Apache Configuration Settings

As you might know a lot of the time I think the LAMP / Wordpress combo is a big bag of shite.

There are so many configuration options, at so many different levels that need tuning to get optimal performance, it is a nightmare to find the right information. There is also too many people offering various solutions for Wordpress / Linux / Apache / MySQL configuration.

Different people recommend different sizes for your config values and just trying to link up server load with page/URL/script requests to find out the cause of any performance issue is a nightmare in itself.

I would have thought there would have been a basic tool out there that could log server load, memory, disk swapping over time and then link that up with the MySQL slow query log, Apache error AND access logs so that you could easily tell when you had issues what processes were running, which URL's were being hit and how much activity was going on to identify culprits for tuning. I have even thought of learning PERL just to write one - not that I want to!

Even with all the MySQL tuning possible, caching plugins installed and memory limits on potentially intensive tasks it can be a nightmare to get the best out of a 1GB RAM, 40GB Virtual Server that is constantly hammered by BOTS, Crawlers and humans. I ban over 50% of my traffic and I still get performance issues at various times of the day - why? I have no FXXING idea!

Without throwing RAM at the problem you can try and set your APACHE values in the config file to appropriate values for your server and MPM fork type.

For older versions of Apache the Multi-Processing Module, non-threaded, pre-forking webserver is well suited as long as the configuration is correct. However it can consume lots of memory if not configured correctly.

For newer versions (2+) the Worker MPM is better as each thread handles a connection at a time and this is considered better for high traffic servers due to the smaller memory footprint. However to get PHP working on this setting apparently needs a lot of configuration and you should read up about this before considering a change.

Read about Apache performance tuning here Apache Performance Tuning.

To find out your current apache version from the console run

apache2 -v OR httpd -v (depending on your server type, if you run top and see apache2 threads then use apache2 otherwise use httpd)

You will get something like this.

Server version: Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) Server built: Feb 5 2012 21:40:20

To find out your current module configuration from the console run

apache2 -V OR httdp -V

Server version: Apache/2.2.9 (Debian)
Server built: Feb 5 2012 21:40:20
Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:15
Server loaded: APR 1.2.12, APR-Util 1.2.12
Compiled using: APR 1.2.12, APR-Util 1.2.12
Architecture: 64-bit Server
MPM: Prefork threaded: no forked: yes (variable process count)
etc etc etc...

There are lots of people giving "suitable" configuration settings for the various apache settings but one thing you need to do if you run TOP and notice high memory usage and especially high virtual memory usage is try and reduce disk swapping.

I have noticed that when Apache is consuming a lot of memory that your virtual memory (disk based) will be high and you will often experience either high server loads and long wait times for pages to load OR very small server loads e.g 0.01-0.05, an unresponsive website and lots of MySQL Server Gone Away messages in your error log file.

You need to optimise your settings so that disk swapping is minimal which means trying to optimise your MySQL settings using the various MySQL tuning tools I have wrote about as well as working out the right size for your Apache configuration values.

One problem is that if you use up your memory by allowing MySQL to have enough room to cache everything it needs then you can find yourself with little left for Apache. Depending on how much memory each process consumes you can easily find that a sudden spike in concurrent hits uses up all available memory and starts disk swapping.

Therefore apart from MySQL using the disk to carry out OR caching large queries you need to find the right number of clients to allow at any one time. If you allow too many and don't have enough memory to contain them all then the server load will go up, people will wait and the amount of disk swapping will increase and increase until you enter a spiral of doom that only a restart fixes.

It is far better to allow fewer connections and serve them up quickly with a small queue and less waiting than open too many for your server to handle and create a massive queue with no hope of ending.

One of the things you should watch out for is Twitter Rushes caused by automatically tweeting your posts to twitter accounts as this can cause 30-50 BOTS to hit your site at once. If they all consume your memory up then it can cause a problem that I have wrote about before.

Working out your MaxClients value

To work out the correct number of clients to allow you need to do some maths and to help you I have created a little bash script to do this.

What it does is find out the average size of an Apache thread then restarts Apache so that the correct "free size" value can be obtained.

It then divides the remainder by the Apache process size. The value you get should be roughly the right value for your MaxClients.

It will also show you how much disk swapped or virtual memory you are using as well as the size of your MySQL process.

I noticed on my own server that when it was under-performing I was using twice as much disk space as RAM. However when I re-configured my options and gave the system enough RAM to accommodate all the SQL / APACHE processes then it worked fine with low swapping.

Therefore if your virtual memory is greater than the size of your total RAM e.g if you are using 1.5GB of hard disk space as virtual memory and only have 1GB of RAM then it will show an error message.

Also as a number of Apache tuners claim that your MinSpareServers should be 10-25% of your MaxClients value and your MaxSpareServers value 25-50% of your MaxClientsValue I have also included the calculations for these settings as well.


#!/bin/bash
echo "Calculate MaxClients by dividing biggest Apache thread by free memory"
if [ -e /etc/debian_version ]; then
 APACHE="apache2"
elif [ -e /etc/redhat-release ]; then
 APACHE="httpd"
fi
APACHEMEM=$(ps -aylC $APACHE |grep "$APACHE" |awk '{print $8'} |sort -n |tail -n 1)
APACHEMEM=$(expr $APACHEMEM / 1024)
SQLMEM=$(ps -aylC mysqld |grep "mysqld" |awk '{print $8'} |sort -n |tail -n 1)
SQLMEM=$(expr $SQLMEM / 1024)
echo "Stopping $APACHE to calculate the amount of free memory"
/etc/init.d/$APACHE stop &> /dev/null
TOTALFREEMEM=$(free -m |head -n 2 |tail -n 1 |awk '{free=($4); print free}')
TOTALMEM=$(free -m |head -n 2 |tail -n 1 |awk '{total=($2); print total}')
SWAP=$(free -m |head -n 4 |tail -n 1 |awk '{swap=($3); print swap}')
MAXCLIENTS=$(expr $TOTALFREEMEM / $APACHEMEM)
MINSPARESERVERS=$(expr $MAXCLIENTS / 4)
MAXSPARESERVERS=$(expr $MAXCLIENTS / 2)
echo "Starting $APACHE again"
/etc/init.d/$APACHE start &> /dev/null
echo "Total memory $TOTALMEM"
echo "Free memory $TOTALFREEMEM"
echo "Amount of virtual memory being used $SWAP"
echo "Largest Apache Thread size $APACHEMEM"
echo "Amount of memory taking up by MySQL $SQLMEM"
if [[ SWAP > TOTALMEM ]]; then
      ERR="Virtual memory is too high"
else
      ERR="Virtual memory is ok"
fi
echo "$ERR"
echo "Total Free Memory $TOTALFREEMEM"
echo "MaxClients should be around $MAXCLIENTS"
echo "MinSpareServers should be around $MINSPARESERVERS"
echo "MaxSpareServers should be around $MAXSPARESERVERS"


If you get 0 for either of the last two values then consider increasing your memory or working out what is causing your memory issues. Either that or set your MinSpareServers to 2 and MaxSpareServers to 4.

There are many other settings which you can find appropriate values for but adding indexes to your database tables and ensuring your database table/query caches can fit in memory rather than swapped to disk is a good way to improve performance without having to resort to more caching at all the various levels Wordpress/Apache/Linux users love doing.

If you do use a caching plugin for Wordpress then I would recommend tuning it so that it doesn't cause you problems.

At first I thought WP SuperCache was a solution and pre-caching all my files would speed things up due to static HTML being served quicker than PHP.

However I found that the pre-cache stalled often, caused lots of background queries to rebuild the files which consumed memory and also took up lots of disk space.

If you are going to pre-cache everything then hold the files as long as possible as if they don't change there seems little point in deleting and rebuilding them every hour or so and using up SQL/IO etc.

I have also turned off gzip compression in the plugin and enabled it at Apache level. It seems pointless doing it twice and PHP will use more resources than the server.

The only settings I have enabled in WP-Super-Cache at the moment are:


  • Don’t cache pages with GET parameters. (?x=y at the end of a url) 
  • Cache rebuild.
  • Serve a supercache file to anonymous users while a new file is being generated. 
  • Extra homepage checks. (Very occasionally stops homepage caching)
  • Only refresh current page when comments made. 
  • Cache Timeout is set to 100000 seconds (why rebuild constantly?)
  • Pre-Load - disabled.

Also in the Rejected User Agents box I have left it blank as I see no reason NOT to let BOTS like googlebot create cached pages for other people to use. As bots will most likely be your biggest visitor it seems odd to not let these BOTS create cached files.

So far this has given me some extra performance.

Hopefully the tuning I have done tonight will help the issue I am getting of very low server loads, MySQL gone away errors and high disk swapping. I will have to wait and see!

Friday, 30 December 2011

New form of Web Site DOS attack leaves millions vulnerable

New security vulnerability can cause most popular websites to become susceptible to DOS attacks.

In a demo called "Efficient Denial of Service Attacks on Web Application Platforms" hosted by
Alexander “alech” Klink and Julian “zeri” Wälde they explained in detail how most web programming languages utilize hashes and manage collisions.

We are not talking about encryption here but the common sort of hashing that allows us to store data in key/value type array objects. It is a simple mathematical hash used to speed up storing and retrieving data posted to web pages used by most web programming languages like PHP and JavaScript.

A very very simple example that doesn't cover all the possibilities that this technique is used and can be exploited would be the following. I k now this is a client side JavaScript hash that would cause more problems for the browser and the users computer than the webserver but as you can run arbitrary JavaScript on any page very easily and XSS hacks are very common nowadays it is still worth showing.

Say I had a client side hash that held some simple values about the system the site was running. These key/values hold different bits of information that are relevant to the object I am using and if a user want to obtain a piece of information they supply the key for the value they want.

System = {
 ProductName: "MySystem",
 Version: 3,
 Build: 3,
 Company: "My Company PLC",
 ServerType: "dev",
 LastBuildDate : "2011-Dec-24 12:45:21"
}


You can get the appropriate value out of the hash table by accessing the appropriate key. In this example if I wanted to find out the current version of the System I would do something like this.

if( System.Version < 3){
 alert("Please upgrade to the latest version");
}

Not a very big hash table but in some cases hash tables can be absolutely huge.

The problem comes if a hacker can overwrite the hash table and set all the keys and values to the same value.

This causes the webserver to get itself into a state of confusion a it doesn't know what to return as all keys are now the same and in the report the authors say:

"An example given showed how submitting approximately two megabytes of values that all compute to the same hash causes the web server to do more than 40 billion string comparisons."

This is obviously a lot of calculation and for just looking up some data on a webpage is a massive overhead that can basically grind the page to a halt.

You can see by my example that by just by overwriting the hash table with all the same values it means my look up for the System.Version would involve checking all the keys in the System object (which would all be set to version) and the server (or in this case the browser as it's client side code) would get into a fiz because it wouldn't know which value to return as all the keys were now the same.

As the authors say only 2MB of values can cause a huge amount of string comparisons which would slow the machine down no end.

Apparently Perl have already done something about this vulnerability some time back but no-one else has yet followed their actions and hopefully it won't take a few big sites to go down before it is fixed across the board.

Without fixing the hashing functions in the languages themselves there are three possible techniques available to website operators to prevent problems occurring.
  • Reduce the length of parameters that can posted.
  • Reduce the number of parameters accepted by the web application framework.
  • Limit the amount of CPU time that any given thread is allowed to run.

Microsoft have released a fix less than 24 hours after disclosure. ASP.NET admins can download patch MS11-100 to protect their IIS web assets. You can find out about this patch from blogs.technet.com